USAF record 302540356
302540356
Document text — page 1 excerpt
PROJECT 10073 RECORD
1. DATE - TIME GROUP 17 July 55 13/002/2
2. LOCATION Burbank, California
3. SOURCE Civilian
4. NUMBER OF OBJECTS Two
5. LENGTH OF OBSERVATION 2 Minutes
6. TYPE OF OBSERVATION Ground-Visual
7. COURSE Stationary
8. PHOTOS [REDACTED]
9. PHYSICAL EVIDENCE [ILLEGIBLE] ONCE
10. CONCLUSION Other (REFLECTION) Photo analysis explains the objects on the prints as being caused by reflection and double image attributed to reflection through the windshield. Visual report consistent with this analysis.
11. BRIEF SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS Hazy day. Objects brighter than stars. Sharply outlined. Object appeared to be vapor trail. All of a sudden it stopped and was no longer visible. Photo taken right to left in front of observer.
Summary by photo analysts. Double image identified. Brightness ten times brighter than contrail or cloud would be. Object can be attributed to reflection and the double image explained by reflection through the windshield.
FORM FTD SEP 63 0-329 (TDE) Previous editions of this form may be used
Page excerpts
- Page 1 PROJECT 10073 RECORD 1. DATE - TIME GROUP 17 July 55 13/002/2 2. LOCATION Burbank, California 3. SOURCE Civilian 4. NUMBER OF OBJECTS Two 5. LENGTH OF OBSERVATION 2 Minutes 6. TYPE OF OBSERVATION…
- Page 2 UNCLASSIFIED PHOTO ANALYSIS REPORT NO 65-41 PAGE 1 OF 1 PARTS DATE OF REPORT 13 Dec 1965 SUBJECT UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECT LOCATION BURBANK, CALIFORNIA DATE 17 JULY 1965 PHOTOGRAPHY M [REDACTED]…
- Page 3 ENGINEERING SUPPORT WORK REQUEST ENGINEERING ANALYSIS [REDACTED] PHOTO ANALYSIS [REDACTED] MACHINE COMPUTATION [REDACTED] PPT NUMBER: A6010101 DESCRIPTION OF WORK: Request evaluation of the attached…
- Page 4 This case has one (1) photograph [HW: 23 Jan 75]
- Page 5 Mrs. Hunt/man/SAFOICO/72342/29 Sep 65 SEP 29 1965 Dear Mr. [REDACTED], The negative which you submitted to the Air Force for analysis is returned. The double image in the print could be caused by a…
- Page 6 HEADQUARTERS FOREIGN TECHNOLOGY DIVISION AIR FORCE SYSTEMS COMMAND UNITED STATES AIR FORCE WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE, OHIO REPLY TO ATTN OF: TGEN SUBJECT: UFO Sighting, 17 Jul 65, Burbank,…
- Page 7 U.S. AIR FORCE TECHNICAL INFORMATION This questionnaire has been prepared so that you can give the U.S. Air Force as much information as possible concerning the unidentified aerial phenomenon that…
- Page 8 Page 2 8. IF YOU SAW THE OBJECT AT NIGHT, WHAT DID YOU NOTICE CONCERNING THE STARS AND MOON? 8.1 STARS (Circle One): a. None b. A few c. Many d. Don't remember 8.2 MOON (Circle One): a. Bright…
- Page 9 Page 3 14. Did the object disappear while you were watching it? If so, how? [HW: I was following Ole Vager trail and it stopped. At the same time, I couldn't see the object anymore.] 15. Did the…
- Page 10 Page 4 20. Do you think you can estimate the speed of the object? (Circle One) [HW: Yes] No IF you answered YES, then what speed would you estimate? [ILLEGIBLE] 21. Do you think you can estimate how…