USAF record 28987208
28987208
Document text — page 1 excerpt
PROJECT 10073 RECORD
1. DATE - TIME GROUP 6 June 60 07/0155Z
2. LOCATION Union City, Indiana (1 Witness)
3. SOURCE Civilian
4. NUMBER OF OBJECTS One
5. LENGTH OF OBSERVATION Not Reported
6. TYPE OF OBSERVATION Ground-Visual
7. COURSE E
8. PHOTOS [HW: In File]
9. PHYSICAL EVIDENCE [HW: No]
10. CONCLUSION INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR EVALUATION PHOTO: No discernible can be identified.
11. BRIEF SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS Object was flying W to E. It was quite high, Flying xix fast and made no condensation trail, but the pattern that appears around it was not visible to the naked eye. The sun was behind the observer xix when he took the picture Observer stated the photo was not a double exposure.
FORM FTD SEP 63 0-329 (TDE) Previous editions of this form may be used.
Page excerpts
- Page 1 PROJECT 10073 RECORD 1. DATE - TIME GROUP 6 June 60 07/0155Z 2. LOCATION Union City, Indiana (1 Witness) 3. SOURCE Civilian 4. NUMBER OF OBJECTS One 5. LENGTH OF OBSERVATION Not Reported 6. TYPE OF…
- Page 2 FID (TDTR) Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio 45433 14 October 1966 [REDACTED] Dear [REDACTED], Please excuse the delay in replying to your letter of 25 April 1966. Your photo and camera data was sent to…
- Page 3 PHOTO JOURNALISM Major Hector Quintanella Jr. Wright Patterson Air Force Base Dayton, Ohio Dear Major Quintanella, After trying in vain to find an explanation to this photograph I am sending a print…
- Page 4 PHOTO ANALYSIS REPORT NR 66-32 PAGE 1 OF 1 PAGES DATE OF REPORT 1 August 1966 SUBJECT UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECT LOCATION UNION CITY, INDIANA DATE 6 JUNE 1960 PHOTOGRAPHY AF IR QUALITY P NRS…
- Page 5 JUNE 6, 1966 ENGINEERING SUPPORT WORK REQUEST [REDACTED] PHOTO ANALYSIS [REDACTED] MACHINE COMPUTATION PPT NUMBER: A6010301 DESCRIPTION OF WORK: Request photo analysis be performed on the attached…
- Page 6 [HW:] This Case includes one (4) 5" x 7" color photograph.
- Page 7 [REDACTED]