USAF record 28963274

Document text — page 1 excerpt

Page excerpts

• Page 1 PROJECT 10073 RECORD CARD 1. DATE 25 Aug 55 2. LOCATION Forland, Missouri 3. DATE-TIME GROUP Local [ILLEGIBLE] GMT 26/0156z 4. TYPE OF OBSERVATION Ground-Radar 5. PHOTOS [HW: Yes] 6. SOURCE Military…
• Page 2 MEMO ROUTING SLIP NEVER USE FOR APPROVALS, DISAPPROVALS, CONCURRENCIES OR SIMILAR ACTIONS 1 NAME OR TITLE Captain Hardin ORGANIZATION AND LOCATION ATIC: AFDIN-4E4 2 [REDACTED] DATE [ILLEGIBLE] 3…
• Page 3 The information is insufficient to definitely tie down the objects seen as ground targets, although this appears to be the most logical explanation. If additional information regarding the terrain…
• Page 4 31. USE THIS SHEET FOR ANY COMMENTS, OPINIONS OR ADDITIONAL DATA NOT COVERED BY THE QUESTIONS. STAMP: UNCLASSIFIED 6. The reoccurrence of targets ranged from 40 to 110 nautical miles. There was no AF…
• Page 5 31. USE THIS SHEET FOR ANY COMMENTS, OPINIONS OR ADDITIONAL DATA NOT COVERED BY THE QUESTIONS. AT APPROXIMATELY 01562, 26 AUGUST 1955, A/28 Bossem noticed a blip at 075°, 23km. Because he waited to…
• Page 6 30. IF SCOPE PHOTOS ARE NOT AVAILABLE, PLOT THE TARGET TRACK AS ACCURATELY AS POSSIBLE. GIVE THE TIME AND ALTITUDE (IF MEASURED) FOR EACH POINT PLOTTED. PUT THE NECESSARY RANGE SCALE ON THE DIAGRAM.…
• Page 7 19. ARE PERSONNEL FAMILIAR WITH THE EFFECTS CAUSED BY AN INTERFERING SIGNAL? [YES] ☐ NO COMMENTS: 20. ARE PERSONNEL FAMILIAR WITH THE EFFECTS OF ANOMALOUS PROPAGATION (DUCTING EFFECTS) AS THEY…
• Page 8 5. HAVE YOU HEARD OF ANYONE NOT AT THE RADAR STATION MAKING A VISUAL SIGHTING AT APPROXIMATELY THE SAME TIME THE RADAR CONTACT WAS MADE? ☐ YES ☐ NO IF SO, GIVE NAME AND ADDRESS. [STAMP: UNCLASSIFIED]…
• Page 9 [STAMP: UNCLASSIFIED] [STAMP: 4602D AISS Classif Document Log #55] UNCLASSIFIED ELECTRONICS DATA SHEET (GROUND RADAR) The purpose of this questionnaire is to provide technical data for evaluating the…