USAF record 28957657
28957657
Document text — page 1 excerpt
PROJECT 10073 RECORD CARD
1. DATE 4 Feb 54
2. LOCATION Carswell AFB, Texas
3. DATE-TIME GROUP Local [ILLEGIBLE] GMT 04/2329Z (N)
4. TYPE OF OBSERVATION Ground-Visual Ground-Radar [HW: Air-Visual] Air-Intercept Radar
5. PHOTOS [HW: Yes] 320Ics
6. SOURCE M11
7. LENGTH OF OBSERVATION --
8. NUMBER OF OBJECTS one
9. COURSE --
10. BRIEF SUMMARY OF SIGHTING Larger than B-35. No trail or means of propulsion. Dark grey. No sound. Long fuselage (See Case File)
11. COMMENTS Object was definitely aircraft.
ATIC FORM 129 (REV 26 SEP 52)
Page excerpts
- Page 1 PROJECT 10073 RECORD CARD 1. DATE 4 Feb 54 2. LOCATION Carswell AFB, Texas 3. DATE-TIME GROUP Local [ILLEGIBLE] GMT 04/2329Z (N) 4. TYPE OF OBSERVATION Ground-Visual Ground-Radar [HW: Air-Visual]…
- Page 2 INVESTIGATION OF UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECT REPORTS Two reports of unidentified flying object sightings, made on the night of 4 Feb 54, were received by ATIC from the 19th Air Division, Carswell Air…
- Page 3 targets 17 miles SW of Carswell AFS, flying in formation at an estimated altitude of 5000 feet and speed of 200 NM. These two targets merged into one and when 12 miles from Carswell they separated…
- Page 4 Since the first sighting was established to be the C-124 there appears to be no relation between this and the second radar sighting. Mr. [REDACTED], after interrogating the GCA operator, was of the…
- Page 5 UNCLASSIFIED PAGE FOUR JUOB 280 (4) TIME AND DATE OF SIGHTING. (A) 0525ZZ. (B) NIGHT. (5) LOCATION OF OBSERVERS. THE GCA OPERATOR WAS IN THE GCA TRUCK AT CARSELL AND THE TOWER PERS WERE IN THE…
- Page 6 UNCLASSIFIED JUNIOR 28 FP JUNIOR JENJO JENJO 333 JUNIOR 280 FORM LABELS AND VALUES: (A) SHAPE OF M. AFT. (B) BASEBALL - WAS DESCRIBED BY OBS AS JUST AS LARGE OR LARGER THAN B-35. (C) DARK GREY. (D)…
- Page 7 ELECTRONICS DATA SHEET (GROUND RADAR) The purpose of this questionnaire is to provide technical data for evaluating the report of an unusual radar target or track. It is requested that it be…
- Page 8 [REDACTED] [STAMP: 1/24/60] [HW: Ate] [HW: 3 Atg-2] [HW: H. Pyle] UNCLASSIFIED [STAMP: 1/24/60] UNCLASSIFIED PERIPHERAL AREA BEFORE DECASION (60) UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED PERIPHERAL AREA BEFORE…
- Page 9 19. ARE PERSONNEL FAMILIAR WITH THE EFFECTS CAUSED BY AN INTERFERING SIGNAL? ☐ YES ☐ NO COMMENTS: 20. ARE PERSONNEL FAMILIAR WITH THE EFFECTS OF ANOMALOUS PROPAGATION (DUCTING EFFECTS) AS THEY…
- Page 10 5. HAVE YOU HEARD OF ANYONE NOT AT THE RADAR STATION MAKING A VISUAL SIGHTING AT APPROXIMATELY THE SAME TIME THE RADAR CONTACT WAS MADE? [REDACTED] 9. RADAR SCOPE PHOTOS: IS RADAR EQUIPPED WITH A…